[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#68930: 30.0.50; Emacs conflates C-Ω and C-ω
From: |
Alexander Prähauser |
Subject: |
bug#68930: 30.0.50; Emacs conflates C-Ω and C-ω |
Date: |
Tue, 06 Feb 2024 13:11:39 +0000 |
"Po Lu" <luangruo@yahoo.com> writes:
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> I think Alexander says that the bindings are reversed, i.e. C-Δ
>> invokes the binding of C-δ and vice versa. That's the bug he is
>> complaining about. Your description seems to suggest that both keys
>> should have invoked the same command, not two different commands
>> exactly reversed from how they were bound.
>
> If so, I can't reproduce the bug by binding keys to the characters he
> specified in his e-mail. Alexander, please send the lines in your XKB
> keymap which bind those characters, or alternatively run:
>
> xkbcomp :0 test.xkb
>
> and attach the test.xkb file produced. Thanks in advance.
The line for, for instance, ω and Ω is
key <AB09> { [ w, W,
EuroSign, U03C9, 9,
U221E, U03A9, U1F61F ]
};
Here, lowercase Greek symbols are on the fourth layer and uppercase on
the seventh. I also included the test.xkb file that you mentioned. I
just had the thought that maybe the behavior can be explained by the way
higher layers are accessed through modifiers: I looked it up, and
usually the fourth layer is accessed through CapsLock and RightShift and
the seventh through CapsLock and RightAlt, but I made it so that the
fourth layer can also be accessed through Backslash and Grave, and if I
use either combination to type C-ω it acts as if I was typing C-Ω.
test.xkb
Description: Binary data
- bug#68930: 30.0.50; Emacs conflates C-Ω and C-ω, Alexander Prähauser, 2024/02/04
- bug#68930: 30.0.50; Emacs conflates C-Ω and C-ω, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/02/05
- Message not available
- bug#68930: 30.0.50; Emacs conflates C-Ω and C-ω, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/02/05
- bug#68930: 30.0.50; Emacs conflates C-Ω and C-ω, Alexander Prähauser, 2024/02/05
- bug#68930: 30.0.50; Emacs conflates C-Ω and C-ω, Alexander Prähauser, 2024/02/05
- bug#68930: 30.0.50; Emacs conflates C-Ω and C-ω, Po Lu, 2024/02/05
- bug#68930: 30.0.50; Emacs conflates C-Ω and C-ω, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/02/06
- bug#68930: 30.0.50; Emacs conflates C-Ω and C-ω, Po Lu, 2024/02/06
- bug#68930: 30.0.50; Emacs conflates C-Ω and C-ω,
Alexander Prähauser <=
- bug#68930: 30.0.50; Emacs conflates C-Ω and C-ω, Alexander Prähauser, 2024/02/06
- bug#68930: 30.0.50; Emacs conflates C-Ω and C-ω, Po Lu, 2024/02/06
- bug#68930: 30.0.50; Emacs conflates C-Ω and C-ω, Alexander Prähauser, 2024/02/06
Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- bug#68930: 30.0.50; Emacs conflates C-Ω and C-ω, Po Lu, 2024/02/08
- bug#68930: 30.0.50; Emacs conflates C-Ω and C-ω, Alexander Prähauser, 2024/02/08
- bug#68930: 30.0.50; Emacs conflates C-Ω and C-ω, Po Lu, 2024/02/08
- bug#68930: 30.0.50; Emacs conflates C-Ω and C-ω, Alexander Prähauser, 2024/02/08
- bug#68930: 30.0.50; Emacs conflates C-Ω and C-ω, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/02/24