tags 68900 notabug
thanks
> Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2024 16:47:57 -0600
> From: Jaft <
jaft.r@outlook.com>
>
> This is where the inconsistent behavior is: if we M-: (forward-line -1)
> or M-: (previous-line) and, then, M-: (point), we'll get what (I would
> think) we'd expect: point 72, the point of the beginning of the second
> line.
>
> BUT, if we do the above via key-binding – i.e. if, from point 145, we
> press C-p to get to the line above – and, then, run M-: (point), we
> get back the number 1.
This is the point-adjustment feature in action: it moves point out of
the invisible text in the direction of the last movement. If you want
to disable it, set global-disable-point-adjustment to a non-nil value;
if you want to disable that temporarily in a Lisp program, set
disable-point-adjustment non-nil before invoking some cursor-movement
command. In your recipe, if you set global-disable-point-adjustment
non-nil, the behavior of previous-line, whether via M-: or C-p, will
be consistent: it will end at position 72.
This is not a bug, but the intended behavior. Read all about it in
the "Adjusting Point" section of the ELisp manual. Admittedly, this
feature can sometimes cause surprising behavior.