bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#66756: 30.0.50; [PATCH] Improve discussion of 'let' in Elisp Introdu


From: Jim Porter
Subject: bug#66756: 30.0.50; [PATCH] Improve discussion of 'let' in Elisp Introduction manual
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 11:30:46 -0700

On 10/26/2023 12:09 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> The challenge in updating the Lisp Introduction manual is to try to
> keep its informal and reader-friendly style as much as possible.  It
> is not just another ELisp Reference manual!  So please try to keep
> that in mind when you write the text, and in particular try not to
> modify the existing text that is still accurate -- it was written by a
> master, and each word there counts, even if it looks at first sight as
> not important.

Ok, here's a second attempt. I've tried to avoid changing anything that I don't think is truly necessary. I did alter a bit of the original wording to emphasize that under lexical binding, 'let' isn't about time, but about place. For example, that's why I changed this:

This is like understanding that whenever your host refers to ``the house'', he 
means his house, not yours.

to this:

This is like understanding that in your host's home, whenever he refers to 
``the house'', he means his house, not yours.

My previous concern about the "lexical binding" digression still applies though. However, I'm not sure how to get around that at present; if we want to talk about lexical binding in the manual, we need to get users to enable it, so I think it's unavoidable that we at least mention it. I tried to introduce the jargon as gently as I could (by first introducing the term "binding" on its own before mentioning "lexical/dynamic binding"), but it's still a bit intimidating. On the positive side, when lexical binding is the default, we could remove that entire digression.

There's also an argument that the example I added is in the wrong spot, since we haven't actually introduced the 'let' syntax yet. However, I personally find the example to be pretty useful since it shows off one of the key differences between lexical and dynamic binding, and helps show one of the boundaries of the 'let' form's scope. I myself tend to learn best by seeing examples of that sort. Fixing the order so we introduce the syntax first would require more extensive changes to this section...

Attachment: 0001-Introduce-let-using-lexical-binding-in-the-Lisp-Intr.patch
Description: Text document


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]