bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#66303: [PATCH] Document 'M-x align' in the Emacs manual


From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: bug#66303: [PATCH] Document 'M-x align' in the Emacs manual
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2023 14:17:10 +0300

> From: Eshel Yaron <me@eshelyaron.com>
> Cc: 66303@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2023 12:47:05 +0200
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> From: Eshel Yaron <me@eshelyaron.com>
> >> Cc: 66303@debbugs.gnu.org
> >> Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2023 12:02:20 +0200
> >>
> >> > Here and elsewhere you mention regexp sub-expressions.  Please add in
> >> > those places a cross-reference to where sub-expressions are described
> >> > in the manual, since this is an advanced aspect of regexps with which
> >> > some readers might not be well acquainted.
> >>
> >> Sure, I've added cross-references to the "Regular Expressions" node in
> >> the Elisp manual.  Alternatively, we could link to "Regexp Backslash" in
> >> the Emacs manual, if you think that's preferable.
> >
> > It is better to cross-reference to the same manual, assuming it does
> > document the sub-expressions.  Only if it doesn't document them well
> > enough should we cross-reference to ELisp.
> 
> Neither manual documents the concept of sub-expressions in detail
> AFAICT, both only describe the relevant syntax.  The text in the Elisp
> manual seems a bit more relevant to me, but I can see how sticking to
> the Emacs manual may be preferable.  I'm attaching a revised (v5) patch
> that refers to "Regexp Backslash" in the Emacs manual instead.  I've
> also added a reference to this bug number in the commit message:

Thanks, installed on the emacs-29 branch, and closing the bug.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]