[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#26217: bug#2910: 23.0.60; Shell-script coloring bug
From: |
Mauro Aranda |
Subject: |
bug#26217: bug#2910: 23.0.60; Shell-script coloring bug |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Oct 2023 09:07:50 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird |
Martin Vath <martin@mvath.de> writes:
> 1. M-x shell-script-mode
> 2. Type: "
> for i do echo 1; done
> for i; do echo 1; done
> "
>
> Despite both lines are correct full loops according to POSIX
> and in fact understood by all current shells (see below),
> this does not correspond to the indentation of emacs and
> coloring of "do" in the first line.
This Bug Report (and the other ones merged with it) have two parts:
- No highlight for "do" in:
for i do echo 1; done
This works if using bash-ts-mode, which claims in its docstring it can
support Bash or sh.
I don't know what's the decision (if there is one) about situations like
these. If the bugs in lang-mode are fixed by lang-ts-mode, will these
bug reports be treated as: wontfix? fixed? open in case someone wants to
spend time in lang-mode?
- Wrong indentation for lines after:
for i do echo 1; done
I took a look at this, and ISTM that giving "do" a special treatment
like sh-smie--sh-keyword-p gives to "in" might fix this, perhaps by
reusing sh-smie--sh-keyword-in-p.
I know very little about SMIE, so I'm CCing Stefan M.
- bug#26217: bug#2910: 23.0.60; Shell-script coloring bug,
Mauro Aranda <=