bug#60830: 30.0.50; The *Compilation* buffer does not recognize Lua errors

[Mattias Engdegård]

12 okt. 2023 kl. 10.12 skrev Rudolf Adamkovič <salutis@me.com>:

>> Maybe you should test it just in case. (You don't need a Windows
>> machine to do that but it adds authenticity).
> 
> I do not understand.

Perhaps you could tell us exactly what you have tested that makes you confident 
in saying that Windows file names have been 'fixed'. Otherwise there is no way 
for us to know, because the tests in your patch give us no indication.

> How do false positives and performance tie to "beauty"?

It's a figure of speech.

By the way, precisely what versions of Lua use the message format you 
described? This information should go into the entry of compilation.txt (and 
the comments describing the new entries in 
compilation-error-regexp-alist-alist).
As you say, Lua versions tend to introduce incompatible changes because of how 
the language is used, and this could very well include the formatting of 
diagnostics.