[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#66247: 29.1; Transient frame problems with Emacs 29 on MS Windows
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug#66247: 29.1; Transient frame problems with Emacs 29 on MS Windows |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Oct 2023 21:27:03 +0000 |
> > I wonder whether it might make sense for the doc
> > to say something about this?
?
> > Maybe more importantly I wonder whether it might
> > make sense to add a user option that has the
> > effect of turning on/off double-buffering for
> > all frames.
>
> We already have that, for every frame-parameter: customize both
> initial-frame-alist and default-frame-alist. Why do we need something
> else, and why should this particular parameter be different from all
> the other frame parameters?
There are several more `*-frame-alist' variables
than those two. `M-x apropos frame-alist'.
And user code can create still more.
- bug#66247: 29.1; Transient frame problems with Emacs 29 on MS Windows, Drew Adams, 2023/10/09
- bug#66247: 29.1; Transient frame problems with Emacs 29 on MS Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/10/09
- bug#66247: 29.1; Transient frame problems with Emacs 29 on MS Windows, Drew Adams, 2023/10/09
- bug#66247: 29.1; Transient frame problems with Emacs 29 on MS Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/10/10
- bug#66247: 29.1; Transient frame problems with Emacs 29 on MS Windows, Drew Adams, 2023/10/10
- bug#66247: 29.1; Transient frame problems with Emacs 29 on MS Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/10/10
- bug#66247: 29.1; Transient frame problems with Emacs 29 on MS Windows, Drew Adams, 2023/10/10
- bug#66247: 29.1; Transient frame problems with Emacs 29 on MS Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/10/10
- bug#66247: 29.1; Transient frame problems with Emacs 29 on MS Windows,
Drew Adams <=