bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#66381: 29.1; Auto-revert not polling files when notifications are en


From: Daniel Jacobowitz
Subject: bug#66381: 29.1; Auto-revert not polling files when notifications are enabled
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2023 14:41:35 -0400

Isn't it?

In auto-revert-handler:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/tree/lisp/autorevert.el#n779

          (if buffer-file-name
              (and (or auto-revert-remote-files
                       (not (file-remote-p buffer-file-name)))
                   (or (not auto-revert-notify-watch-descriptor)
                       auto-revert-notify-modified-p)
                   (if auto-revert-tail-mode
                       (and (file-readable-p buffer-file-name)
                            (/= auto-revert-tail-pos
                                (setq size
                                      (file-attribute-size
                                       (file-attributes buffer-file-name)))))
                     (funcall (or buffer-stale-function
                                  #'buffer-stale--default-function)
                              t)))

When buffer-file-name, revert is true iff:

1. auto-revert-remote-files or the file is not remote
AND 2. there is no watch descriptor or a notification was received
AND 3. some details about auto-revert-tail-mode OR t

If auto-revert-notify-watch-descriptor and not
auto-revert-notify-modified-p, then the file won't be reverted.
auto-revert-handler does get called by the polling timer, but it
doesn't revert.


On Sat, Oct 7, 2023 at 2:28 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <daniel.jacobowitz@gmail.com>
> > Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2023 14:14:45 -0400
> > Cc: 66381@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> >
> > Coming back to my original suggestion: the documentation says that polling 
> > is used even if
> > notifications are enabled. The implementation does not poll if there's a 
> > notification registered.
>
> That last sentence is not true.



-- 
Thanks,
Daniel





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]