[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#66363: gdb-control-commands-regexp issues
From: |
Mattias Engdegård |
Subject: |
bug#66363: gdb-control-commands-regexp issues |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Oct 2023 17:07:22 +0200 |
The variable `gdb-control-commands-regexp` in gdb-mi.el cannot work as
currently defined and used. Only group 3 is of interest, but that group hasn't
referred to anything useful for several years.
Group 3 probably refers to a part of the regex's tail where the command
argument is matched:
"\\([[:blank:]]+\\([^[:blank:]]*\\)\\)*$"
However, this seems to be broken as well, because all groups here are inside
repetitions. This part of the regexp is also exponential in form if not in
practice but we'd better simplify it anyway.
Attached is a suggested patch which makes explicit the command abbreviations
matched, and leaves only a single submatch. It also changes the tail to
assuming that the command argument doesn't contain non-newlines (or the final
eol anchor wouldn't make sense) but that it can contain spaces (which seems
reasonable). However, right now the argument is only checked for being
non-empty or not.
I don't have a working gdb setup at the moment so if someone would be kind to
test it, I would be very grateful for it.
gdb-control-commands-regexp.diff
Description: Binary data
- bug#66363: gdb-control-commands-regexp issues,
Mattias Engdegård <=
- bug#66363: gdb-control-commands-regexp issues, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/10/05
- bug#66363: gdb-control-commands-regexp issues, Mattias Engdegård, 2023/10/05
- bug#66363: gdb-control-commands-regexp issues, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/10/05
- bug#66363: gdb-control-commands-regexp issues, Mattias Engdegård, 2023/10/05
- bug#66363: gdb-control-commands-regexp issues, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/10/05
- bug#66363: gdb-control-commands-regexp issues, Mattias Engdegård, 2023/10/06
- bug#66363: gdb-control-commands-regexp issues, Mattias Engdegård, 2023/10/29