[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#61396: diff mode could distinguish changed from deleted lines
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
bug#61396: diff mode could distinguish changed from deleted lines |
Date: |
Sun, 01 Oct 2023 21:53:02 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/30.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
>>> I have been bitten several times in the past when going through largish
>>> diffs where I overlooked important things in the added/removed parts
>>> because they were colored the same was as the unchanged parts of
>>> changed lines and so I just glossed over them.
>>
>> I realized now the same problem exists even without color highlighting
>> at all.
>
> No, the problem I describe is specific to the "refined" diff
> highlighting: I rely on this highlighting to tell me what has "really"
> been changed, yet it's not applied to lines that are "just added" or
> "just removed" so I end up skipping over them unwittingly because they
> are highlighted identically to the *unchanged* parts of those lines
> which are otherwise changed.
AFAICS, GitHub tries to address this problem by using less refining:
only changes inside a single line are refined. I don't like this,
but maybe such an option could help at least by not promising that
all added/removed text is using the refined diff highlighting.
On the other extreme, your option `diff-refine-nonmodified`
could consistently highlight all added/removed text,
but such highlighting is too "heavy".
So a new option could be like font-lock levels,
and we need to find a balance for the default value.