[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#62751: 29.0.90; New libraries that still need to be assigned to pack
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
bug#62751: 29.0.90; New libraries that still need to be assigned to packages |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Sep 2023 16:45:28 -0700 |
Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
> Is there an assumption now that all Elisp files in Emacs need to be
> assigned to some package? When did that get decided?
>
> Surely many files fit well into a package, but why be rigid about it?
> There must be some that don't.
AFAIU, files with this comment header are not considered assigned to any
"real" package:
;; Package: emacs
More precisely, they are considered part of the "emacs" package, but
that package is treated specially in various situations. For example,
it is not listed in `M-x package-list', and so on.
- bug#62751: 29.0.90; New libraries that still need to be assigned to packages, (continued)
- bug#62751: 29.0.90; New libraries that still need to be assigned to packages, Stefan Monnier, 2023/09/18
- bug#62751: 29.0.90; New libraries that still need to be assigned to packages, Stefan Kangas, 2023/09/20
- bug#62751: 29.0.90; New libraries that still need to be assigned to packages, Jonas Bernoulli, 2023/09/18
- bug#62751: 29.0.90; New libraries that still need to be assigned to packages, Jonas Bernoulli, 2023/09/20
- bug#62751: 29.0.90; New libraries that still need to be assigned to packages, Jonas Bernoulli, 2023/09/18
- bug#62751: 29.0.90; New libraries that still need to be assigned to packages, Stefan Kangas, 2023/09/20
- bug#62751: 29.0.90; New libraries that still need to be assigned to packages, Richard Stallman, 2023/09/19
- bug#62751: 29.0.90; New libraries that still need to be assigned to packages,
Stefan Kangas <=