[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#65988: 30.0.50; Emacs and -O3 compiler optimization
From: |
Arash Esbati |
Subject: |
bug#65988: 30.0.50; Emacs and -O3 compiler optimization |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Sep 2023 11:22:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Hi all,
in this message[1], Eli explained why the -O3 optimization switch isn't
recommended when building Emacs:
In a nutshell, it bloats the code (due to excessive inlining), with no
real effect on speed. The inner loops in Emacs are very large, and
thus the techniques used by -O3 to speed up code (loop unrolling etc.)
don't really work. Moreover, they could make things worse because the
larger loops might no longer fit into the L1 cache of the CPU.
The -O3 is well suited to speed up relatively simple algorithms with
tight loops. Emacs has very few of those, in the places that matter
for observable performance.
Presuming that the note above applies to GCC on all platforms, I suggest
to change/adjust the following example in INSTALL[2]:
Here's an example of a 'configure' invocation, assuming a Bourne-like
shell such as Bash, which uses these variables:
./configure \
CPPFLAGS='-I/foo/myinclude' LDFLAGS='-L/bar/mylib' \
CFLAGS='-O3' LIBS='-lfoo -lbar'
(this is all one shell command). This tells 'configure' to instruct the
preprocessor to look in the '/foo/myinclude' directory for header
files (in addition to the standard directories), instruct the linker
to look in '/bar/mylib' for libraries, pass the -O3 optimization
switch to the compiler, and link against libfoo and libbar
libraries in addition to the standard ones.
IIRC this was the place where I picked up the -O3 switch for the script
I wrote for building Emacs.
Best, Arash
Footnotes:
[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2023-06/msg01274.html
[2] http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/tree/INSTALL#n493
- bug#65988: 30.0.50; Emacs and -O3 compiler optimization,
Arash Esbati <=