[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#62862: 26.3; Minor bug in (emacs) Shift Selection
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#62862: 26.3; Minor bug in (emacs) Shift Selection |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Sep 2023 14:16:48 +0300 |
> Cc: 62862@debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 13:49:24 -0700
>
> severity 62862 wishlist
> thanks
>
> Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:
>
> > "shift-selection" isn't a noun or a programming name. It's a noun
> > phrase, and should be written as "shift selection". In particular,
> > index entry "shift-selection" should also be replaced by "shift
> > selection". It might be good to also add a glossary entry for "shift
> > selection".
>
> I think you're probably right here, but we have many 114 occurrences of
> "shift-selection" in our tree. I think it doesn't make sense to fix one
> without fixing the others, and then you'd need to be careful because
> some of them might refer to the symbol `shift-select'.
>
> So ultimately, I'm not sure it's worth spending time on. I guess we
> could accept a patch.
>
> Eli, what do you think?
English is not my first language, so the intricacies of the grammar
frequently elude me, but: how is this different from byte-compilation,
native-compilation, and other similar terminology that we use all over
the place?
In any case, I agree that this bug report is splitting hair.