[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#65418: 29.1; Eglot: support clangd inactiveRegions extension
From: |
João Távora |
Subject: |
bug#65418: 29.1; Eglot: support clangd inactiveRegions extension |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Sep 2023 13:49:51 +0100 |
On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 1:44 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> > But I admit I'm not fully aware of how these things are counted
> > "officially", so better safe than sorry and I reverted them. But
> > I would very much like to re-revert of course, as this was a lot
> > of work and is a pretty valuable change, IMO. Let's wait for Eli to
> > explain how to proceed.
>
> To provide a helpful answer I need to know how much code was provided
> by Filippo. Where can I see that?
Some 4 or 5 messages ago in this thread. Here:
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=65418#32
Two patches are there and they correspond more or less to the two
(very heavily modified) commits I did on top of them.
João
- bug#65418: 29.1; Eglot: support clangd inactiveRegions extension, Filippo Argiolas, 2023/09/02
- bug#65418: 29.1; Eglot: support clangd inactiveRegions extension, João Távora, 2023/09/03
- bug#65418: 29.1; Eglot: support clangd inactiveRegions extension, João Távora, 2023/09/03
- bug#65418: 29.1; Eglot: support clangd inactiveRegions extension, Filippo Argiolas, 2023/09/04
- bug#65418: 29.1; Eglot: support clangd inactiveRegions extension, Filippo Argiolas, 2023/09/04
- bug#65418: 29.1; Eglot: support clangd inactiveRegions extension, João Távora, 2023/09/04
- bug#65418: 29.1; Eglot: support clangd inactiveRegions extension, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/04
- bug#65418: 29.1; Eglot: support clangd inactiveRegions extension,
João Távora <=
- bug#65418: 29.1; Eglot: support clangd inactiveRegions extension, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/04
- bug#65418: 29.1; Eglot: support clangd inactiveRegions extension, João Távora, 2023/09/04
- bug#65418: 29.1; Eglot: support clangd inactiveRegions extension, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/04