bug#65209: 30.0.50; Unexpected behaviour of setq-local

[Michael Heerdegen]

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

> > Recently there was a question, I tried to find it again but failed,
> > where a user wanted to set, or expected a variable to be set - was it
> > `lexical-binding'? - and that failed because there was a binding of
> > `lexical-binding' in the call chain that prevented this.
>
> AFAIU you're describing the problem that lead to the current bug-report :-)

Likely.  Ok, then I think we are done (the report is already closed).

Thx,

Michael.