[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#65451: 30.0.50; `after-change-functions' are not triggered in the sa
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#65451: 30.0.50; `after-change-functions' are not triggered in the same order the changes are made |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Aug 2023 13:25:35 +0300 |
> From: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net>
> Cc: casouri@gmail.com, 65451@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 08:09:41 +0000
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> >> Elements of the list will be like
> >> [:buffer-chars-modified-tick :region-beginning :region-end-before-edit
> >> :region-end-after-edit]
> >
> > If you really need buffer-chars-modified-tick, you will have to verify
> > that it is updated before calling the function which updates the
> > "transactions list".
>
> Do you mean that buffer-chars-modified-tick may not be yet updated at
> the time treesit_record_change is called?
Yes. You can audit the code and see it for yourself.
> Then, treesit_record_change only uses byte positions. Will it be
> possible to record buffer point positions, or may it be problematic?
Sorry, I don't understand what you are saying here and how this is
relevant to the issue at hand and to my comment in particular.
- bug#65451: 30.0.50; `after-change-functions' are not triggered in the same order the changes are made, (continued)
- bug#65451: 30.0.50; `after-change-functions' are not triggered in the same order the changes are made, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/08/24
- bug#65451: 30.0.50; `after-change-functions' are not triggered in the same order the changes are made, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/08/24
- bug#65451: 30.0.50; `after-change-functions' are not triggered in the same order the changes are made, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/08/24
- bug#65451: 30.0.50; `after-change-functions' are not triggered in the same order the changes are made, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/08/24
- bug#65451: 30.0.50; `after-change-functions' are not triggered in the same order the changes are made, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/08/24
- bug#65451: 30.0.50; `after-change-functions' are not triggered in the same order the changes are made, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/08/24
- bug#65451: 30.0.50; `after-change-functions' are not triggered in the same order the changes are made, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/08/25
- bug#65451: 30.0.50; `after-change-functions' are not triggered in the same order the changes are made, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/08/25
- bug#65451: 30.0.50; `after-change-functions' are not triggered in the same order the changes are made, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/08/26
- bug#65451: 30.0.50; `after-change-functions' are not triggered in the same order the changes are made, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/08/25
- bug#65451: 30.0.50; `after-change-functions' are not triggered in the same order the changes are made,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#65451: 30.0.50; `after-change-functions' are not triggered in the same order the changes are made, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/08/25