[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#65051: internal_equal manipulates symbols with position without chec
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
bug#65051: internal_equal manipulates symbols with position without checking symbols-with-pos-enabled. |
Date: |
Sat, 5 Aug 2023 13:04:07 +0000 |
Hello, Eli.
On Sat, Aug 05, 2023 at 15:13:22 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2023 11:52:52 +0000
> > Cc: 65051@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>,
> > acm@muc.de
> > From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
> > Hello, Eli.
> > On Sat, Aug 05, 2023 at 13:57:50 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > > Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2023 10:45:37 +0000
> > > > Cc: 65051@debbugs.gnu.org, acm@muc.de
> > > > From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
> > [ .... ]
> > > > > So we can have two different copies of #<symbol foo at 42>, such that
> > > > > their hex values are different? Isn't that a bug? why don't we
> > > > > conflate such identical symbols?
> > > > No, it's not a bug, anymore than having two `equal' copies of '(a b c)
> > > > would be a bug.
> > > But with symbols we store them in obarray, and obarray ought to find
> > > the existing slot for #<symbol foo at 42> and reuse it, rather than
> > > create a new slot?
> > No, only the bare symbol is in the obarray. The symbol with position
> > itself is a pseudovector, with contents (i) a bare symbol (a Lisp_Object
> > "pointing at" the obarray) and (ii) the unsigned integer position.
> Please document this factoid in the ELisp manual, I think it's very
> important, and having it undocumented is a Bad Thing.
DONE. The change is near the top of the following patch, amended from
the previous version.
diff --git a/doc/lispref/symbols.texi b/doc/lispref/symbols.texi
index 34db0caf3a8..a828d303c04 100644
--- a/doc/lispref/symbols.texi
+++ b/doc/lispref/symbols.texi
@@ -784,9 +784,15 @@ Symbols with Position
@cindex bare symbol
A @dfn{symbol with position} is a symbol, the @dfn{bare symbol},
together with an unsigned integer called the @dfn{position}. These
-objects are intended for use by the byte compiler, which records in
-them the position of each symbol occurrence and uses those positions
-in warning and error messages.
+objects are stored internally much like vectors, and don't themselves
+have entries in the obarray (though their bare symbols do;
+@pxref{Creating Symbols}).
+
+Symbols with position are for the use of the byte compiler, which
+records in them the position of each symbol occurrence and uses those
+positions in warning and error messages. They shouldn't normally be
+used otherwise. Doing so can cause unexpected results with basic
+Emacs functions such as @code{eq} and @code{equal}.
The printed representation of a symbol with position uses the hash
notation outlined in @ref{Printed Representation}. It looks like
@@ -798,11 +804,20 @@ Symbols with Position
For most purposes, when the flag variable
@code{symbols-with-pos-enabled} is non-@code{nil}, symbols with
-positions behave just as bare symbols do. For example, @samp{(eq
-#<symbol foo at 12345> foo)} has a value @code{t} when that variable
-is set (but @code{nil} when it isn't set). Most of the time in Emacs this
-variable is @code{nil}, but the byte compiler binds it to @code{t}
-when it runs.
+positions behave just as their bare symbols would. For example,
+@samp{(eq #<symbol foo at 12345> foo)} has a value @code{t} when the
+variable is set; likewise, @code{equal} will treat a symbol with
+position argument as its bare symbol.
+
+When @code{symbols-with-pos-enabled} is @code{nil}, any symbols with
+position continue to exist, but do not behave as symbols, or have the
+other useful properties outlined in the previous paragraph. @code{eq}
+returns @code{t} when given identical arguments, and @code{equal}
+returns @code{t} when given arguments with @code{equal} components.
+
+Most of the time in Emacs @code{symbols-with-pos-enabled} is
+@code{nil}, but the byte compiler and the native compiler bind it to
+@code{t} when they run.
Typically, symbols with position are created by the byte compiler
calling the reader function @code{read-positioning-symbols}
@@ -820,7 +835,7 @@ Symbols with Position
a symbol with position, ignoring the position.
@end defvar
-@defun symbol-with-pos-p symbol.
+@defun symbol-with-pos-p symbol
This function returns @code{t} if @var{symbol} is a symbol with
position, @code{nil} otherwise.
@end defun
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
- bug#65051: internal_equal manipulates symbols with position without checking symbols-with-pos-enabled., Alan Mackenzie, 2023/08/04
- bug#65051: internal_equal manipulates symbols with position without checking symbols-with-pos-enabled., Eli Zaretskii, 2023/08/04
- bug#65051: internal_equal manipulates symbols with position without checking symbols-with-pos-enabled., Alan Mackenzie, 2023/08/04
- bug#65051: internal_equal manipulates symbols with position without checking symbols-with-pos-enabled., Eli Zaretskii, 2023/08/04
- bug#65051: internal_equal manipulates symbols with position without checking symbols-with-pos-enabled., Alan Mackenzie, 2023/08/04
- bug#65051: internal_equal manipulates symbols with position without checking symbols-with-pos-enabled., Eli Zaretskii, 2023/08/04
- bug#65051: internal_equal manipulates symbols with position without checking symbols-with-pos-enabled., Alan Mackenzie, 2023/08/05
- bug#65051: internal_equal manipulates symbols with position without checking symbols-with-pos-enabled., Eli Zaretskii, 2023/08/05
- bug#65051: internal_equal manipulates symbols with position without checking symbols-with-pos-enabled., Alan Mackenzie, 2023/08/05
- bug#65051: internal_equal manipulates symbols with position without checking symbols-with-pos-enabled., Eli Zaretskii, 2023/08/05
- bug#65051: internal_equal manipulates symbols with position without checking symbols-with-pos-enabled.,
Alan Mackenzie <=
- bug#65051: internal_equal manipulates symbols with position without checking symbols-with-pos-enabled., Eli Zaretskii, 2023/08/05
- bug#65051: internal_equal manipulates symbols with position without checking symbols-with-pos-enabled., Alan Mackenzie, 2023/08/13
bug#65051: internal_equal manipulates symbols with position without checking symbols-with-pos-enabled., Mattias Engdegård, 2023/08/05