|
| From: | Juri Linkov |
| Subject: | bug#64656: 29.0.91; Doc of minibuffer histories and completing-read - automatic addition of completions to DEFAULT list |
| Date: | Wed, 19 Jul 2023 09:35:32 +0300 |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/30.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
> Try this: > > `C-h v org TAB' > `M-n' > `M-n' > `M-n' > `M-n' > `M-n' > `M-n' > `M-n' > ... Why candidates are inserted in a random order? It would make sense to insert them in the same order as they are sorted in the *Completions* buffer. But then `M-n' will become an equivalent of `M-down'. So maybe better to sort candidates by recency/frequency? But then how `M-n' will be different from `M-p'? I think ideally it should use the same order as used by icomplete-mode.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |