[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#64590: Patch: fix gud-go in gdb-mi.el
From: |
Wang Diancheng |
Subject: |
bug#64590: Patch: fix gud-go in gdb-mi.el |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jul 2023 17:07:18 +0800 |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> 于2023年7月15日周六 16:42写道:
>
> > From: Wang Diancheng <dianchengwang@gmail.com>
> > Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 11:06:32 +0800
> > Cc: 64590@debbugs.gnu.org
> >
> > Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> 于2023年7月13日周四 16:58写道:
> > >
> > > > From: Wang Diancheng <dianchengwang@gmail.com>
> > > > Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 12:40:58 +0800
> > > >
> > > > document of gud-go says "Start or continue execution. Use a prefix to
> > > > specify arguments." but it always prompts for program arguments
> > > > regardless of whether "C-u" is pressed because arg is numeric prefix
> > > > here.
> > >
> > > Right, gud-def specifies '(interactive "p")'.
> > >
> > > > The attachment is a patch to change gud-go just prompts if
> > > > prefix is not 1.
> > >
> > > This will have the subtlety that "C-u 1 C-v" will fail to ask for
> > > program arguments. Shouldn't we instead look at current-prefix-arg?
> > >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Yes, I think it's a good idea. the patch is updated as that.
>
> Thanks, installed on the emacs-29 branch, and closing the bug.
>
Thanks.
> With this contribution, you have exhausted the amount of changes we
> can accept from you without a copyright assignment. Would you like to
> start the legal paperwork of assigning to the FSF the copyright for
> your changes, so that we could in the future accept more contributions
> from you without limitations? If yes, I will send you the form to
> fill.
My copyright assignment has been in progress.