[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#64046: 30.0.50; Quoting in customize choice tags
From: |
Mauro Aranda |
Subject: |
bug#64046: 30.0.50; Quoting in customize choice tags |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Jul 2023 10:20:17 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 |
Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@gmx.net> writes:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 19:59:26 -0300 Mauro Aranda
<maurooaranda@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@gmx.net> writes:
>>
>>>> Thanks for the feedback. You're right, that patch is too superficial;
>>>> it also fails to do substitution in popup extended menus like the one
>>>> produced by clicking the "State" button, with the result that in the
>>>> item "Revert This Session's Customization" the apostrophe is not
>>>> displayed in the "curve" style. So I revised the patch, attached
below,
>>>> to iterate over the elements of each item in ITEMS, and it now appears
>>>> to handle substitution with the "State" button display correctly, both
>>>> as popup menu and as text menu buffer. The latter is the result of
>>>> applying widget--simplify-menu, if I debugged correctly, so I
think this
>>>> answers your concerns (though the text menu buffer already shows the
>>>> substitution independently of my patch, due to commit bd3b426ebb). Or
>>>> have I misunderstood your concerns about widget--simplify-menu?
If so,
>>>> can you give an example where the new patch fails?
>>>
>>> Just pinging in case this fell under the radar. If there's no
response,
>>> what's the next step forward?
>>>
>>> Steve Berman
>>
>> It did, thanks for the ping.
>>
>> Since there's no problem with widget--simplify-menu, the patch looks
>> good to me.
>
> Thanks. So Eli, should this go into master, since it's not a
> regression, or is it ok to install this to the release branch? It does
> seem pretty safe, since it's only applying substitute-command-keys in a
> few more places in widget-choose.
>
> Steve Berman
Turns out this code introduces regressions when customizing faces.
With emacs -Q:
M-x customize-face RET default
Action the State button and choose: "For All Kinds of Displays"
Action the Display menu and select "specific display"
Wrong type argument: number-or-marker-p, " "
The substitute-command-keys operation is too destructive, and messes
with things it shouldn't be modifying, like the :offset property of
widgets in this case.
- bug#64046: 30.0.50; Quoting in customize choice tags,
Mauro Aranda <=