|
From: | iarchivedmywholelife |
Subject: | bug#64452: [Wishlist/PATCH] Use special-mode for *Native-compile-log*, *Async-native-compile-log* |
Date: | Wed, 05 Jul 2023 08:52:44 -0400 |
Feel free to alter the patch as you see fit. I have no more time to invest in it. -------- Original message -------- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> Date: 7/5/23 7:25 AM (GMT-05:00) To: No Wayman <iarchivedmywholelife@gmail.com> Cc: acorallo@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 64452@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#64452: [Wishlist/PATCH] Use special-mode for *Native-compile-log*, *Async-native-compile-log* > Cc: Andrea Corallo <acorallo@gnu.org>, Stefan Monnier > <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>, 64452@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2023 18:21:00 -0400 > > Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes: > > > Thanks, but why not elisp-compile-mode, like we do in > > *Compile-log* > > buffers for byte compilation? > > Works for me. Revision attached. > > diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/comp.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/comp.el > index 22fb08e4688..5f42d10407f 100644 > --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/comp.el > +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/comp.el > @@ -1133,7 +1133,8 @@ comp-log-to-buffer > (log-buffer > (or (get-buffer comp-log-buffer-name) > (with-current-buffer (get-buffer-create comp-log-buffer-name) > - (setf buffer-read-only t) > + (unless (derived-mode-p 'emacs-lisp-compilation-mode) > + (emacs-lisp-compilation-mode)) bytecomp.el uses (unless (derived-mode-p 'compilation-mode) (emacs-lisp-compilation-mode)) Isn't that better? Also, do we really need to do this twice in comp-run-async-workers? Andrea, any comments? |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |