bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#64402: Byte compile bug in calfw


From: Sylvain Salvati
Subject: bug#64402: Byte compile bug in calfw
Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2023 07:44:01 +0200
User-agent: mu4e 1.11.7; emacs 30.0.50



Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>
> Is that built from the current HEAD of the master branch?  If not,
> please update from Git, bootstrap, and try again.  There were several
> problems with byte code fixed lately on the master branch.
>

I recompiled emacs from the current HEAD. It now works.

>> Emacs 30.0.50 bytecode
>> 
>> (defalias 'cfw:dest-ol-selection-clear #[(dest) "\304!\305 :\203
>> @\306\n!\210 A\211\202*\307!\310\305\311#)\207" [dest #1=#:--cl-var-- i
>> #2=#:v #[(cl-x) "\301!\204\302\303\304D\"\210\305H\207" [cl-x #[(cl-x)
>> "\302! >\205 \303\207" [cl-x cl-struct-cfw:dest-tags type-of t] 2] signal
>> wrong-type-argument cfw:dest 10] 4] nil delete-overlay #[(cl-x)
>> "\301!\204\302\303\304D\"\210\305H\207" [cl-x #[(cl-x) "\302! >\205
>> \303\207" [cl-x cl-struct-cfw:dest-tags type-of t] 2] signal
>> wrong-type-argument cfw:dest 10] 4] \(setf\
>> internal--with-suppressed-warnings\) ((lexical cl-x))] 5 (#$ . 69087)])
>
> I'm not sure I understand why you think there's a problem with the
> byte compiler, but let's revisit this after you try with the latest
> master branch.

I thought it was a byte compiler problem as the byte code contains the
expression that was causing problem and that does not at all look like
bytecode : \(setf\ internal--with-suppressed-warnings\) ((lexical cl-x))

Best,

S.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]