bug#64154: 29.0.92; Provide additional details on GnuPG and EPA usage in epa.texi

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2023 22:20:12 +0200
> Cc: 64154@debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Jens Schmidt <jschmidt4gnu@vodafonemail.de>
> 
> >>     @cindex GnuPG version compatibility
> >>     @cindex version compatibility with GnuPG
> >>     @cindex compatibility with GnuPG
> > 
> > They are not redundant, since they all start differently.  But I would
> > suggest to consider the first one for removal.
> 
> Why, then?

Because people are very unlikely to think about "GnuPG version
compatibility".  They are likely to think about "version
compatibility" and perhaps just "compatibility".  Just put yourself
into the shoes of such a reader, and ask yourself what would you type
at Info-index's prompt.

> I can imagine using that as index search, for example if I remember
> that the section is named like that.  Plus it does not seem to break
> completion.

If you remember the name of the section, you can usually use 'g',
since node names are usually very similar to section names.

> > The Texinfo manual doesn't need to be changed.  It's a very good
> > manual.  [...]
> 
> At least w.r.t. to capitalization you both seem to fundamentally
> disagree (quotes from "Index Entries(texinfo)"):
> 
>    [...] capitalizing only proper
>    names and acronyms that always call for uppercase letters.
>    This is the case convention we use in most GNU manuals'
>    indices.

My personal rule is to use capital letters in index entries only when
absolutely necessary.  It is not necessary with "gpg" or "gnupg".  The
above citation says something similar.

> Attached a third patch - please review 2nd and 3rd combined against 1st.

Does it mean the patch you sent is just part of the changes?