[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#63626: [PATCH] Make forward and backward-to-word arg optional
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#63626: [PATCH] Make forward and backward-to-word arg optional |
Date: |
Sun, 28 May 2023 08:16:53 +0300 |
> From: Zaz Brown <zazbrown@zazbrown.com>
> Date: Sat, 27 May 2023 11:39:35 -0700
> Cc: dalanicolai@gmail.com, 63626@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 12:02 AM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> > But I'm still not convinced we need to change the signature of the
> > function. What are the use cases where you'd want to pass
> > forward-to-word as a function argument to another function?
>
> I can't think of a good example and wasn't able to find an example of
> a forward-to-word lambda on GitHub code search. So perhaps I'm
> mistaken that this would be useful. I'll have to leave that
> discussion to those who are more familiar with Emacs and Lisp.
Thanks.
Does anyone else here have an opinion on this changeset?
- bug#63626: [PATCH] Make forward and backward-to-word arg optional, Zaz Brown, 2023/05/21
- bug#63626: [PATCH] Make forward and backward-to-word arg optional, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/05/26
- Message not available
- bug#63626: [PATCH] Make forward and backward-to-word arg optional, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/05/27
- bug#63626: [PATCH] Make forward and backward-to-word arg optional, Zaz Brown, 2023/05/27
- bug#63626: [PATCH] Make forward and backward-to-word arg optional,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#63626: [PATCH] Make forward and backward-to-word arg optional, dalanicolai, 2023/05/29
- bug#63626: [PATCH] Make forward and backward-to-word arg optional, Juri Linkov, 2023/05/29
- bug#63626: [PATCH] Make forward and backward-to-word arg optional, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/05/31