> These steps seem to provoke a failure of the original test quite reliably on macOS:
> 1. add the call (sleep-for 1) both before and after (proced-refine), to widen the windows
> 2. in a different terminal, keep the command
> while true; do /bin/sleep 2 & sleep 0.1; done
Thanks for this, with the help of these instructions I can reproduce.
> but I think the test should still pass in this case
Sorry I was wrong here, if the process used for the refinement exited between proced being called, and then `(proced-update t)` being called, then the whole process list will be shown as proced would skip applying the refinement. So I think using (proced-update) instead of (proced-update t) is the simplest fix since it means `proced-process-alist` will never be refreshed. I've re-attached the patch from before, but with a bit more explanation.
Thanks, Laurence
0001-Fix-unstable-proced-test.patch