bug#63731: [PATCH] Support Emoji Variation Sequence 16 (FE0F) where appropriate

[Steven Allen]

Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> writes:
> Welcome to the wonderful world of Unicode. The reason the table exists
> is that there are codepoints that are *not* emoji, but theyʼre part of
> emoji sequences, so we still need to treat them as emoji in some
> situations. Why Unicode didnʼt just make them emoji I donʼt know.

Got it... It sounds like the "correct" solution is to download the full
list (emoji-variation-sequences.txt) and filter for non-emoji
characters, but I guess that's overkill.

Thanks!