[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#63535: Master branch: Error in forw_comment (syntax.c) handling of e
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
bug#63535: Master branch: Error in forw_comment (syntax.c) handling of escaped LFs |
Date: |
Mon, 22 May 2023 16:16:49 +0000 |
Hello, Stefan.
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 11:16:40 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > I think the following patch is better. Would you please have a look at
> > it, in the hope I haven't made any other silly mistakes. Thanks!
> I don't see any silly mistake there, sorry.
Thanks! I've committed the patch, and I'm closing the bug.
> Stefan
> PS: It does remind me that we really should do ourselves a favor and get rid
> of the distinction between `Sescape` and `Scharquote`.
> IIRC there's a risk of backward incompatibility, so it has to be done
> progressively, but we should start the process. E.g. first declare one of the
> two as obsolete, then emit a warning when we see it being used, ...
Yes. I think Sescape should be the survivor. I don't know if
Scharquote is used at all in Emacs code.
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
bug#63535: Master branch: Error in forw_comment (syntax.c) handling of escaped LFs, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/05/16