bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#63536: Feature Request


From: Jim Porter
Subject: bug#63536: Feature Request
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 09:53:38 -0700

On 5/17/2023 6:37 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
So you want a command to check whether a newer Emacs is available?
But where should this command look?  Many (most?) people install
precompiled binaries prepared by their distros, and I assume those
distros have their "check for updates" service or something?

We could check on the GNU FTP site, but how many users will want to
download and build Emacs from sources?

What do other people think about this?

I think we could fairly easily *check* for the existence of a newer Emacs release, but the hard part is what to do about it. Is it enough to merely tell the user, "Emacs 29.1 is released," and just expect the user to figure out how to update?

For users who get their Emacs from their distro, the distro is responsible for updates then. We can ignore that case.[1] (Ditto for any other package manager: PPAs, Homebrew, etc.)

However, for users who get their Emacs from GNU FTP, the only update mechanism right now is 100% manual. It would be interesting to try to fix that, but it also seems difficult: if the user downloaded Emacs and compiled from source, can we make 100% sure that we can do that programmatically for the next release? What if Emacs adds a new library dependency? Maybe GNU FTP could also distribute binaries in some fashion instead[2], but that's yet another complexity to work out. If we distributed binaries, how would we do so?

If someone wanted to spend the time to figure out all the issues with this, I think there'd be value in it, but I also think it's more effort than it's worth (unless this is literally just a notification, nothing more).

[1] That's what Firefox does too: if you install Firefox from Mozilla, it'll handle updating itself, but if you install it from your distro, the distro handles the updates.

[2] There are the MS-Windows binaries, but I don't think we should be spending too much effort on something that would only benefit users of a nonfree OS.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]