|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot |
Date: | Thu, 27 Apr 2023 12:00:51 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0 |
On 27/04/2023 08:41, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 02:05:21 +0300 From: Dmitry Gutov <dmitry@gutov.dev> Cc: jporterbugs@gmail.com, philipk@posteo.net, 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, larsi@gnus.org, joaotavora@gmail.com On 25/04/2023 21:35, Dmitry Gutov wrote:So I think we need to rephrase that. Something like Packages which are part of the Emacs distribution cannot be updated that way.This is probably better. As long as we understand it to read "packages which are part ... and were never upgraded to a version from ELPA".Anyway, if we agree to keep this unfixed, we should probably add this text somewhere: either into the docstring anyway, or to etc/PROBLEMS.Do we agree to leave package-update unchanged?
Apparently so.
And what about the renaming you suggested in another bug report?
Still waiting for your go-ahead. Although it sounds like I have it.
I'd like to make a new pretest soon, with all these issues finalized as best as we can.
Very good.
As for PROBLEMS, I'm not sure. We usually put there only something that people actually complain about, not proactively. How about mentioning this in the doc string instead?
Sure. Hopefully it won't create an impression that the described behavior is _intended_.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |