[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot
From: |
João Távora |
Subject: |
bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Apr 2023 17:31:24 +0100 |
On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 5:12 PM Dmitry Gutov <dmitry@gutov.dev> wrote:
>
> On 14/04/2023 18:34, João Távora wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 2:52 PM Robert Pluim<rpluim@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I have no objection to catering to people who have already asked for
> >> the installation of a package that is now :core. But one that wasnʼt
> >> installed explicitly (ie itʼs only there because Emacs now ships it)
> >> shouldnʼt be upgraded.
> > I think I don't fully understand.
> >
> > Maybe you can answer this: if a user is setting up Emacs 28 in company
> > laptop machines regularly and does M-x package-install RET eglot RET there,
> > or has a script with (package-install 'eglot), should or shouldn't this
> > user, in your opinion, be allowed to do exactly the same, with the same
> > predictable results (in this case getting the latest Eglot), when she starts
> > doing the same in Emacs 29, which now contains Eglot as a built-in?
>
> I think Robert asked whether 'M-x package-menu-mark-upgrades' would mark
> Eglot for upgrade even if the user never marked it for upgrade
> explicitly before (e.g. with 'M-x package-install').
Sorry, I missed that. This package-menu interface really seems like
its own thing, a separate package manager with its own nomenclature
and rules.
BTW use-package also calls package-install, and
(use-package eglot :ensure t) is the number one installation form
for Eglot says google, chatGPT and 4 out of 5 bugs I get.
Unless special steps are taken there, it will likely be broken,
too. That form will no longer give users the latest Eglot starting
Emacs 29. Fortunately, though the use-package manual "expects that
most users will find [package.el] capable enough", it also
explains how to switch away from package.el into a third party
package-manager. Given the state of this bug and for their sake,
I hope they do.
João
- bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot, (continued)
- bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/14
- bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot, João Távora, 2023/04/14
- bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/14
- bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot, João Távora, 2023/04/14
- bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/14
- bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot, João Távora, 2023/04/14
- bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/04/14
- bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot,
João Távora <=
- bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/04/14
- bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot, João Távora, 2023/04/14
- bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/04/14
- bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot, João Távora, 2023/04/14
- bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/04/14
- bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot, João Távora, 2023/04/14
- bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/14
- bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot, João Távora, 2023/04/14
- bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/14
- bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/04/14