[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' s
From: |
Philip Kaludercic |
Subject: |
bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade' |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Apr 2023 13:44:43 +0000 |
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>>> It's annoyingly late to rename, but if we rename without compatibility
>>> aliases (which seems to be an option since these are new in Emacs-29),
>>> then I'd be in favor.
>>
>> What are compatibility aliases? I must have missed something?
>
> I thought we'd rename `package-update` to `package-upgrade` by adding
> the new name and marking the old name as an obsolete alias (a
> "compatibility alias").
>
> I hadn't realized that `package-update` hasn't been in a release yet, so
> we don't need such a compatibility alias.
If this were to happen, I'd like to also be able to rename the analogous
package-vc commands to upgrade as well.
(On a related topic I have been wondering if package-update should
handle package-vc packages at all, or if that was a mistake?)
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade', (continued)
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade', Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/12
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade', Stefan Monnier, 2023/04/12
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade', Dmitry Gutov, 2023/04/14
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade', Dmitry Gutov, 2023/04/23
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade', Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/24
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade', Adam Porter, 2023/04/24
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade', Dmitry Gutov, 2023/04/24
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade', Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/24
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade', Dmitry Gutov, 2023/04/24
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade', Stefan Monnier, 2023/04/30
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade',
Philip Kaludercic <=
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade', João Távora, 2023/04/12
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade', Jim Porter, 2023/04/19
bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade', Dmitry Gutov, 2023/04/27