[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' s
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade' |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:22:03 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
>> It's annoyingly late to rename, but if we rename without compatibility
>> aliases (which seems to be an option since these are new in Emacs-29),
>> then I'd be in favor.
>
> What are compatibility aliases? I must have missed something?
I thought we'd rename `package-update` to `package-upgrade` by adding
the new name and marking the old name as an obsolete alias (a
"compatibility alias").
I hadn't realized that `package-update` hasn't been in a release yet, so
we don't need such a compatibility alias.
Stefan
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade', Adam Porter, 2023/04/10
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade', Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/10
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade', Philip Kaludercic, 2023/04/10
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade', Stefan Monnier, 2023/04/10
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade', Dmitry Gutov, 2023/04/11
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade', Stefan Monnier, 2023/04/11
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade', Philip Kaludercic, 2023/04/12
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade',
Stefan Monnier <=
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade', Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/12
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade', Stefan Monnier, 2023/04/12
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade', Dmitry Gutov, 2023/04/14
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade', Dmitry Gutov, 2023/04/23
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade', Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/24
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade', Adam Porter, 2023/04/24
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade', Dmitry Gutov, 2023/04/24
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade', Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/24
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade', Dmitry Gutov, 2023/04/24
- bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade', Stefan Monnier, 2023/04/30