[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, pa
From: |
João Távora |
Subject: |
bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29 |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Mar 2023 11:19:16 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@gmx.de> writes:
>> I've tested Thomas's example 5 times in a row, moving around energically, in
>> the Emacs -Q, exercising multiple Eglot features, etc. 0% failures.
>
> I've applied the patch, but Thomas' recipe still blocks for me. Sorry to
> tell you.
Drats. Reproduced.
I honestly don't know what's going on. Yesterday I got 0% failures,
today I get 100% failures with the very same code. Maybe there is some
SSH/ControlMaster thing at the OS level that's tainting the experiment.
FWIW, removing the JUST-THIS-ONE make Thomas' example always pass, but
it has other implications like the re-entrancy thing, which I don't
understand.
I don't have any better ideas at the moment, other than just biting the
bullet and reading Tramp's code very closely. I'll try my hand at
adapting a process-filter into it as I described in bug#61350, but I
don't know if I'll manage of course, since I'm not closely acquainted
with the API.
Very sorry for the noise,
João
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, (continued)
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, Michael Albinus, 2023/03/16
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, João Távora, 2023/03/16
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, miha, 2023/03/16
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, João Távora, 2023/03/16
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, João Távora, 2023/03/16
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, miha, 2023/03/17
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/17
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, miha, 2023/03/17
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/17
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, Michael Albinus, 2023/03/17
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29,
João Távora <=
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, Michael Albinus, 2023/03/18
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, João Távora, 2023/03/18
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, Michael Albinus, 2023/03/18
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, João Távora, 2023/03/18
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, Michael Albinus, 2023/03/19
bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, João Távora, 2023/03/15