[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#62072: 29.0.60; tree-sitter interferes with Custom
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#62072: 29.0.60; tree-sitter interferes with Custom |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Mar 2023 14:40:24 +0200 |
> From: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>
> Cc: 62072@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 20:19:29 +0800
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > Why is what?
>
> I mean, why can't we wrap whatever in Custom is generating the warning
> inside `with-no-warnings' for now?
If you can suggest a patch which affects only the cases where these
options are evaluated as part of a large group, that's fine by me.
The problem is that we _do_ want the warning if the use customizes
specific options that require tree-sitter. If Customize can
distinguish between those, I'm all for warning in one case, but not in
the other.
- bug#62072: 29.0.60; tree-sitter interferes with Custom, Po Lu, 2023/03/09
- bug#62072: 29.0.60; tree-sitter interferes with Custom, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/09
- bug#62072: 29.0.60; tree-sitter interferes with Custom, Po Lu, 2023/03/09
- bug#62072: 29.0.60; tree-sitter interferes with Custom, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/09
- bug#62072: 29.0.60; tree-sitter interferes with Custom, Po Lu, 2023/03/09
- bug#62072: 29.0.60; tree-sitter interferes with Custom, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/10
- bug#62072: 29.0.60; tree-sitter interferes with Custom, Po Lu, 2023/03/10
- bug#62072: 29.0.60; tree-sitter interferes with Custom, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/10
- bug#62072: 29.0.60; tree-sitter interferes with Custom, Po Lu, 2023/03/10
- bug#62072: 29.0.60; tree-sitter interferes with Custom,
Eli Zaretskii <=