[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again
From: |
Theodor Thornhill |
Subject: |
bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Mar 2023 07:03:33 +0100 |
Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Mar 5, 2023, at 12:22 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>>
>>> From: Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2023 15:03:46 -0800
>>> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
>>> Daniel Martín <mardani29@yahoo.es>,
>>> 61893@debbugs.gnu.org
>>>
>>>>>>> The elif directive’s and subsequent directives aren’t indented
>>>>>>> properly. Looking at the parsed tree, the elif directives are nested in
>>>>>>> the if directive, and the nesting can be arbitrarily deep. We probably
>>>>>>> need a custom function rather than great-grand-parent to find the
>>>>>>> anchor,
>>>>>>> like a function that keeps going up the tree until the node isn’t a
>>>>>>> preproc directive anymore.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yuan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, you're right. I'll see what I can do, but bandwidth is a little
>>>>>> low at the moment, so if you have some extra time, don't hesitate to
>>>>>> improve it :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Absolutely, I’ll work on it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yuan
>>>>
>>>> Thanks :)
>>>
>>> Done!
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Some problems still remain.
>
> Thanks, there are so many edge cases :-)
>
>>
>> Line 1761 of dispnew.c: type "C-e RET" -- point goes to column 7
>> instead of the expected column 2.
>
> Fixed.
>>
>> Line 3381 of dispnew.c: type "C-e RET" -- point goes to the correct
>> column, but line 3381 is reindented incorrectly.
>
> This is due to it aligning to the previous sibling, aka the comment. Do we
> want to skip comments for the “align to the prev sibling” rule?
>
>>
>> Line 6611 of dispnew.e: type "C-e RET" -- point goes to column 0
>> instead of the expected column 2. If you type "C-e RET" on the next
>> line 6612, point goes to column 0 and the line is reindented
>> incorrectly.
>
> Fixed.
>>
>> Line 13925 of xdisp.c: type "C-e RET" -- point goes to column 33(!)
>> and line 13925 is reindented incorrectly.
>
> Fixed.
>>
>> Lines 34529 and 34530 of xdisp.c: "C-e RET" produces incorrect column
>> of point and reindents line 34530.
>
> The preproc directive messed the parse tree, and tree-sitter can’t tell that
> it’s an else statement, so it can’t be easily fixed sadly.
>
> Yuan
Now this isn't indenting how I expect:
int foo
{
| // <-- Now point is indented to column 0
}
It seems like `c-ts-mode--anchor-prev-sibling` isn't handling this?
Theo
- bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again, (continued)
- bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/01
- bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again, Yuan Fu, 2023/03/01
- bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/02
- bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again, Yuan Fu, 2023/03/02
- bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again, Theodor Thornhill, 2023/03/03
- bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again, Yuan Fu, 2023/03/03
- bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again, Theodor Thornhill, 2023/03/04
- bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again, Yuan Fu, 2023/03/04
- bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/05
- bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again, Yuan Fu, 2023/03/05
- bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again,
Theodor Thornhill <=
- bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/06
- bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/06