[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#61489: bug#61490: bug#61489: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 10
From: |
Konstantin Kharlamov |
Subject: |
bug#61489: bug#61490: bug#61489: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768 |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Feb 2023 13:30:10 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.46.4 |
On Fri, 2023-02-24 at 11:50 +0100, Robert Pluim wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 18:41:34 +0200, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> > > > > > said:
>
> >> Cc: 61489@debbugs.gnu.org, 61490@debbugs.gnu.org
> >> From: Konstantin Kharlamov <hi-angel@yandex.ru>
> >> Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 18:53:02 +0300
> >>
> >> On Thu, 2023-02-23 at 16:49 +0100, Robert Pluim wrote:
> >> > > > > > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 18:30:00 +0300, Konstantin Kharlamov
> >> > > > > > > <hi-angel@yandex.ru> said:
> >> >
> >> > Konstantin> So, it's been a week since version 2 was posted and
> 10-11 days
> >> > since I started
> >> > Konstantin> using the change locally. Everything has been nice
> and dandy,
> >> > and in absence of
> >> > Konstantin> further comments, I wonder if somebody with write
> permissions
> >> > could merge this
> >> > Konstantin> patch?
> >> >
> >> > Iʼve had no issues with it. Eli? Does this require 'Copyright-
> paperwork-
> >> > exempt: yes'?
> >>
> >> No, I have a copyright assignment with GNU for Emacs, it's just that I
> don't write permissions :)
>
> Eli> Sorry, you are right. Ignore my previous message where I said the
> Eli> Copyright-paperwork-exempt thingy is necessary.
>
> OK, Iʼve merged the two bugs. I can push whenever you deem itʼs ready.
There was no opposition in any of the answers, so I presume it is ready…?
- bug#61489: [PATCH 1/1] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 2¹⁰to 2¹⁵, (continued)
- bug#61489: [PATCH 1/1] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 2¹⁰to 2¹⁵, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/02/13
- bug#61489: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768, Konstantin Kharlamov, 2023/02/16
- bug#61490: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768, Konstantin Kharlamov, 2023/02/23
- bug#61490: bug#61489: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768, Robert Pluim, 2023/02/23
- bug#61490: bug#61489: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768, Konstantin Kharlamov, 2023/02/23
- bug#61490: bug#61489: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768, Robert Pluim, 2023/02/23
- bug#61490: bug#61489: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768, Konstantin Kharlamov, 2023/02/23
- bug#61489: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768, Robert Pluim, 2023/02/23
- bug#61489: bug#61490: bug#61489: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/23
- bug#61489: bug#61490: bug#61489: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768, Robert Pluim, 2023/02/24
- bug#61489: bug#61490: bug#61489: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768,
Konstantin Kharlamov <=
- bug#61489: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/23
Message not available
bug#61490: [PATCH 0/1] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 2¹â°to 2¹âµ, Richard Stallman, 2023/02/16
bug#61490: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768, Konstantin Kharlamov, 2023/02/16