|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | bug#61369: Problem with keeping tree-sitter parse tree up-to-date |
Date: | Fri, 10 Feb 2023 03:38:04 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 |
On 10/02/2023 03:22, Yuan Fu wrote:
I just want to confirm that I can reproduce this, and that if you skip the trailing newline from the use-statement, I don't get this behavior. So it seems like the newline is the crucial point, right? Yes, same. Thr trailing newline is necessary. The empty lines at the beginning of the buffer (being copied to) are necessary to reproduce this as well.Hmmm, it might be related to how does tree-sitter does incremental parsing? If the newline is necessary, then I guess it’s not because Emacs missed characters when reporting edits to tree-sitter.
The newline is somewhat necessary: the scenario doesn't work, for example, if the pasted text doesn't include the newline but the buffer had an additional (third) one at the top.
But the scenario also doesn't work if some other (any) character is removed from the yanked line before pasting: it could be even one after the comment instruction (//).
OTOH, if I add an extra char to the yanked line, anywhere, I can skip the newline. E.g. I can paste
use std::path::{self, Path, PathBuf}; // good: std is a crate namee without a newline and still see the exact same syntax error.So it looks more like an off-by-one error somewhere. Maybe in our code, but maybe in tree-sitter somewhere.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |