|
| From: | Jim Porter |
| Subject: | bug#61281: “`(a \, b)” equals to “`(a . , b)” |
| Date: | Sat, 4 Feb 2023 22:32:08 -0800 |
On 2/4/2023 8:32 PM, Michael Heerdegen wrote:
I don't decide about this, but when we changed the semantics of `,' like you suggest, we will probably break a lot of code for no real gain (I think the semantics in Elisp clear and easy to understand), so this sounds like a very bad idea to me.
What about emitting a warning? That shouldn't break anything, and it might catch some bugs. (I'm not sure if a warning is easy to add for this though...)
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |