bug#60623: 30.0.50; Add forward-sentence with tree sitter support

[Theodor Thornhill]

Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net> writes:

>>>> So is this to be considered an improvement to forward-sexp too, then?
>>>
>>> Sorry, I can't find where a lambda is set to forward-sexp-function.
>>> I only see this:
>>>
>>>   (defvar forward-sexp-function nil
>>>
>>> But if it will be set to a function later, it would be nice
>>> to define a default function as well.
>>
>> I meant the way we did with 'transpose-sexps', where there now is a
>> 'transpose-sexps-function' variable containing the factored-out earlier
>> implementation.  And by if "this is an improvement" I meant declaring a
>> specific defun as the default value for the defvar in question.  Maybe I
>> should add the same change which is now developing here there too.
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> I agree that 'transpose-sexps-function' could benefit from the same 
> improvement.

Yeah, added such a change in bug#60654, as it was already reported :-)

I appreciate your feedback!

Theo