bug#59666: 29.0.50; Eshell: comparisons such as {> 3 2} do not work in Eshell context

[Jim Porter]

On 11/28/2022 4:15 PM, Milan Zimmermann wrote:
> All behavior of comparisons below is incorrect
>
> # Comparisons using ">"

This is actually working as intended, though it's another one of those 
surprising behaviors that you tend to get in Eshell due to its fusion of 
Lisp and shell syntax.

The problem is that ">" and "<" are I/O redirection operators (though 
"<" isn't actually implemented yet). If you want to do a less- or 
greater-than comparison using command-style syntax, you'd need to escape it:

  ~ $ \> 3 2
  t

> ### 4.
> ~/tmp $ if {> 3 2} {echo YES} {echo NO}
> Actual: NO
> Expected: YES

One additional note. Even with the proper escapes, that won't work right:

  ~ $ if {\> 3 2} {echo YES} {echo NO}
  YES
  ~ $ if {\> 3 4} {echo YES} {echo NO}
  YES  ;; Wrong!

That's because the above form is actually just checking, "Did the Lisp 
function '>' signal an error?"[1] You'd need to use ${} expansion, which 
expands to the *output* of the subcommand (and then checks that it's 
non-nil), or the Lisp form $()/():

  ~ $ if ${\> 3 2} {echo YES} {echo NO}
  YES
  ~ $ if ${\> 3 4} {echo YES} {echo NO}
  NO
  ~ $ if (> 3 2) {echo YES} {echo NO}
  YES
  ~ $ if (> 3 4) {echo YES} {echo NO}
  NO
  ~ $ if $(> 3 2) {echo YES} {echo NO}
  YES
  ~ $ if $(> 3 4) {echo YES} {echo NO}
  NO

Maybe {...} forms should work more like (...) forms when it finds a Lisp 
function that's not prefixed with 'eshell/'. I'll have to think about 
this some more though...

[1] This is all assuming there's no external program named ">".