|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | bug#41572: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Support plain project marked with file .emacs-project |
Date: | Mon, 28 Nov 2022 14:30:15 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 |
On 28/11/2022 13:58, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Like the patch also says (and what's given me a pause in the past), that also makes "VC project" somewhat a misnomer. But I'm not sure what to call them betterHow about VC-backed project?Is that different?I don't know. You asked for alternatives, and that is what I could think of.I would say it might be worse: "VC-backed" sounds like a project that must correspond to a VC repository (be "backed" by it).It usually is, isn't it?
Usually -- yes, the default ootb configuration will have projects backed by VC repositories, because the default set of markers is determined by the value of 'vc-handled-backends'.
But now the users will be able to extend that set of markers through customization.
If it doesn't have to, then we should look for a different name ASAP, one that doesn't include "VC" at all.
I haven't been able to come up with anything more concrete than "builtin", and that's both a non-name and not exactly true since 'transient' also exists. But "VC aware" might also fit the bill. It sounds more like an adjective, though, than a proper noun.
OTOH a new term we could use would stand for something like: a project type which will recognize the enabled kinds of VC repositories and use their roots as project root, and knows how to use certain VC systems to speed up the fetching of files, and knows about Git submodules, but also recognizes other directories (inside or outside of VC repositories) based on configurable conditions.If this type of project doesn't have to be "backed by a VCS", then what does distinguish it from other types of projects?
It difficult to come up with a name using a principle like that when the preceding effort was made to be able to accommodate the projects of different users with new usage patterns.
It is "VC aware" or maybe "VC friendly", and it works with projects in the shape of directory trees. But both characterizations can apply to e.g. Projectile as well. Except the latter is probably more flexible, and our backend is probably faster, especially over Tramp.
But if we just compare with the other builtin ('transient'), then its VC awareness is probably the key thing. And the customization options it has (which 'transient' doesn't).
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |