bug#59603: 28.1.90; `ucs-normalize-string' fails to work

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net>
> Cc: 59603@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 09:37:47 +0000
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> I do see that uppercase symbol names may not always refer to the
> arguments, but don't `str' fit better into the conventions? It is the
> symbol to be used in the macro, after all.
> Or do I miss something?

How else do you suggest to indicate in the doc string that the macro
operates on a variable named 'str'?  Using `str' is much more confusing,
IMO.