[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#59476: Inconsistency in TeX input method: \ggg vs \Ll
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#59476: Inconsistency in TeX input method: \ggg vs \Ll |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Nov 2022 18:52:23 +0200 |
> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
> Cc: shulman@sandiego.edu, 59476@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 16:52:03 +0100
>
> tags 59476 fixed
> close 59476 29.1
> quit
>
> >>>>> On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 16:19:56 +0200, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> said:
>
> >> Cc: 59476@debbugs.gnu.org
> >> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
> >> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 12:06:45 +0100
> >>
> >> (with-temp-buffer
> >> (activate-input-method "TeX") ;; the input method has to be triggered
> for `quail-package-alist' to be non-nil
> >> (let ((quail-current-package (assoc "TeX" quail-package-alist)))
> >> (quail-define-rules ((append . t))
> >> ("\\lll" ?⋘))))
> >>
> >> (I donʼt use the TeX input method, so I canʼt judge if doing that by
> >> default makes sense, although adding it as an alternative seems
> >> relatively harmless.)
>
> Eli> Would you please add it? TIA.
>
> Done
Thanks!