bug#59379: 29.0.50; `define-advice' documentation needs improving

[Stefan Kangas]

Visuwesh <visuweshm@gmail.com> writes:

>> 3. This is its argument list:
>>
>>    (define-advice SYMBOL (HOW LAMBDA-LIST &optional NAME DEPTH) &rest
>>    BODY)
>>
>>    The HOW, LAMBDA-LIST, NAME, DEPTH parameters are not documented in
>>    the docstring, nor in the info manual.
>
> HOW, LAMBDA-LIST, NAME, and DEPTH arguments become clear when once looks
> up the add-function docstring, and the docstring already mentions
> add-function.

Then that should be explicitly stated.

And LAMBDA-LIST is not explained there either, AFAICT.

>> 5. The documentation of NAME says that: "The advice is an anonymous
>>    function if NAME is ‘nil’ or a function named ‘symbol@name’."
>>
>>    I struggle with parsing this sentence.  It sounds like it is saying
>>    that, if I want an anonymous function, I should define a function
>>    named `symbol@name' (substituting `symbol' and `name') and then pass
>>    that argument as the NAME argument?  But then the function is not
>>    anonymous?
>
> Would a comma help before the "or"? i.e.,
>
>     The advice is an anonymous function if NAME is ‘nil’, or a function
>     named ‘symbol@name’.

So it can be either nil or a symbol?  How do I actually use it?

> Changing symbol@name to SYMBOL@NAME like in the docstring will make it
> clearer, I think.  If still not clear, the following happens in the case
> of NAME being nil vs. non-nil
>
>     NAME nil ==> (advice-add SYMBOL HOW (lambda LAMBDA-LIST BODY) ...)
>     NAME non-nil ==> (advice-add SYMBOL HOW (defun SYMBOL@NAME LAMBDA-LIST 
> BODY) ...)

This all needs to be explained clearly in the documentation.