|
From: | João Távora |
Subject: | bug#59214: [PATCH] Alternate rust-analyzer command added |
Date: | Fri, 18 Nov 2022 08:44:35 +0000 |
> From: Pankaj Jangid <pankaj@codeisgreat.org>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, "M. Ian Graham"
> <hello+emacs@miangraham.com>, 59214@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 10:43:02 +0530
>
> João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >> FWIW, I think Rust is too crazy for us to follow its daily changes and
> >> offer support for its server OOTB in eglot-server-programs. Emacs is
> >> not equipped to follow such frequent and radical changes. If we want
> >> to make this seamless for users of Rust, we should provide a special
> >> command to update eglot-server-programs with whatever it is the latest
> >> Rust fashion. Or maybe we should even leave that to Rust mode.
> >>
> >
> > Yes, indeed, my thoughts exactly, especially this last bit.
> >
>
> Agree.
>
> And thank you, Ian, for bringing up the counter thoughts in the
> discussion. It was an eye opener for me. I was thinking `rustup' is the
> only way to use `rust'.
So what's the bottom line here? Do we need to make any change in
eglot.el, and if so, what change is that?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |