[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#59214: [PATCH] Alternate rust-analyzer command added
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#59214: [PATCH] Alternate rust-analyzer command added |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Nov 2022 21:31:39 +0200 |
> From: João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 17:14:11 +0000
> Cc: Pankaj Jangid <pankaj@codeisgreat.org>, 59214@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> Here, we would need and rust expert to explain why the the middle entry is
> different or more useful than the
> first one. I'm not that expert, but Pankaj's rationale looks reasonably sane.
> So maybe delete the simple
> "rust-analyzer" one? Or maybe not. But two entries for the same server looks
> odd. As i said, this must be
> looked at by someone with knowledge of rust toolchain and configuration
> idioms.
For starters, maybe Pankaj could provide more details to answer your
questions? Perhaps after talking to a Rust expert?
- bug#59214: [PATCH] Alternate rust-analyzer command added, Pankaj Jangid, 2022/11/12
- bug#59214: [PATCH] Alternate rust-analyzer command added, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/11/16
- bug#59214: [PATCH] Alternate rust-analyzer command added, M. Ian Graham, 2022/11/17
- bug#59214: [PATCH] Alternate rust-analyzer command added, Pankaj Jangid, 2022/11/17
- bug#59214: [PATCH] Alternate rust-analyzer command added, M. Ian Graham, 2022/11/17
- bug#59214: [PATCH] Alternate rust-analyzer command added, Pankaj Jangid, 2022/11/17