[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#57079: 29.0.50; Performance of seq-uniq is not very good
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#57079: 29.0.50; Performance of seq-uniq is not very good |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Aug 2022 20:07:17 +0300 |
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Cc: Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se>, 57079@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 18:57:33 +0200
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > What's wrong with using delete-dups for your cases above?
>
> delete-dups is destructive.
No one said that was a problem in these cases.
- bug#57079: 29.0.50; Performance of seq-uniq is not very good, Stefan Kangas, 2022/08/09
- bug#57079: 29.0.50; Performance of seq-uniq is not very good, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/08/09
- bug#57079: 29.0.50; Performance of seq-uniq is not very good, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/08/09
- bug#57079: 29.0.50; Performance of seq-uniq is not very good, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/09
- bug#57079: 29.0.50; Performance of seq-uniq is not very good, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/08/09
- bug#57079: 29.0.50; Performance of seq-uniq is not very good, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/08/09
- bug#57079: 29.0.50; Performance of seq-uniq is not very good, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/09
- bug#57079: 29.0.50; Performance of seq-uniq is not very good, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/08/09
- bug#57079: 29.0.50; Performance of seq-uniq is not very good, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/09
- bug#57079: 29.0.50; Performance of seq-uniq is not very good, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/08/09