[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#56388: Overline equivalent of x-underline-at-descent-line
From: |
Hendrik Rommeswinkel |
Subject: |
bug#56388: Overline equivalent of x-underline-at-descent-line |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Jul 2022 03:14:32 +0000 |
That would be even better! It is a more logical place to put this
On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 9:51 AM, Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com> wrote: Hendrik Rommeswinkel <rommeswi@proton.me> writes:
> I noticed that overline text is not as configurable as underline
> text. Using x-underline-at-descent-line, it is possible to choose
> between placing the underline at the baseline or the bottom line (I
> think the naming of this option is not quite right.). However, it is
> not possible to choose between placing the overline at the ascent line
> or the top line. Instead it is always at the top line. This makes
> overline very ugly when the height of faces differs on a line because
> the overline will appear at the very top of the line instead of on top
> of the font.
>
> It would be nice if there would be an option x-overline-at-ascent-line
> which places the overline at the ascent line (instead of the top
> line).
Instead of making it a user option, how about making it an attribute for
the `:overline' face property?
publicKey - rommeswi@proton.me - a02357c6.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature