[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#54233: 29.0.50; [PATCH] Missing symbols in tex--prettify-symbols-ali
From: |
Arash Esbati |
Subject: |
bug#54233: 29.0.50; [PATCH] Missing symbols in tex--prettify-symbols-alist |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Mar 2022 16:34:39 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 |
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
> Is there any point in adding the numerical code to all these lines?
It's for reference only to show which character LaTeX will pick. One
difference I found between the current implementation and my patch is
the entry for \textdied. Current implementation is:
character: ✝ (displayed as ✝) (codepoint 10013, #o23435, #x271d)
to input: type "C-x 8 RET 271d" or "C-x 8 RET LATIN CROSS"
LaTeX does (and my change too):
character: † (displayed as †) (codepoint 8224, #o20040, #x2020)
to input: type "C-x 8 RET 2020" or "C-x 8 RET DAGGER"
One could now argue that the current implementation is better for
prettifying, but I would say to stick with LaTeX does to keep the
difference between final product and what you see in the editor low.
But that's only me.
> And if we want that, I think this should be two patches -- one that
> adds the new symbols,
I can provide a new patch and delete the code points, just let me know.
Best, Arash