[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#52467: 29.0.50; Use pop-to-buffer for shell
From: |
Theodor Thornhill |
Subject: |
bug#52467: 29.0.50; Use pop-to-buffer for shell |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:19:37 +0100 |
On 13 December 2021 22:14:31 CET, Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru> wrote:
>On 13.12.2021 19:16, Steingold wrote:
>> It seems much more reasonable to use pop-to-buffer in eshell rather than
>> break shell's behavior.
>
>That seems reasonable too.
>
I don't have any objections, but not my call.
>I think we'll do whatever the maintainers decide on this issue.
Agreed!
Theo
- bug#52467: 29.0.50; Use pop-to-buffer for shell, Steingold, 2021/12/13
- bug#52467: 29.0.50; Use pop-to-buffer for shell, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/12/13
- bug#52467: 29.0.50; Use pop-to-buffer for shell,
Theodor Thornhill <=
- bug#52467: 29.0.50; Use pop-to-buffer for shell, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/19
- bug#52467: 29.0.50; Use pop-to-buffer for shell, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/12/19
- Message not available
- bug#52467: 29.0.50; Use pop-to-buffer for shell, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/20
- bug#52467: 29.0.50; Use pop-to-buffer for shell, Sam Steingold, 2021/12/23
- bug#52467: 29.0.50; Use pop-to-buffer for shell, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/12/23
- bug#52467: 29.0.50; Use pop-to-buffer for shell, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/24
- bug#52467: 29.0.50; Use pop-to-buffer for shell, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/12/25
- bug#52467: 29.0.50; Use pop-to-buffer for shell, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/26
- bug#52467: 29.0.50; Use pop-to-buffer for shell, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/12/26
- bug#52467: 29.0.50; Use pop-to-buffer for shell, Sam Steingold, 2021/12/26